Consortia

Cost

Institutions participating in a consortium will incur a $140 participation fee. Additional fees for appending extra question sets are also assessed.

Base FeeAdditional Item Coordination Fee
Coordinated use of one Topical Module$140none
Coordinated use of two Topical Modules*$140$305
Coordinated use of a customized question set$140$360
Coordinated use of one Topical Module AND a customized question set$140$360
No coordination of extra question sets$140none

*Note that the fee incurred for appending two Topical Modules is the same whether or not the institution participates in a consortium. An institution is not “double-billed” for appending Topical Modules when participating in a consortium.

Coordinator Role

The Consortium Coordinator is responsible for registering the consortium each year in August. During registration the coordinator will select from among a variety of options:

  • Deciding whether a peer group comprised of consortium members will be displayed on the reports created for Institutions, and/or;
  • Coordinating use of Topical Modules and/or a customized question set of questions.

The coordinator serves as the point of contact for NSSE staff and helps ensure completion of all survey administration details. Coordinators recruit institutions, finalize coordination of extra survey items in early September, remind eligible and desired institutions to enroll, and coordinate data sharing agreements when necessary. NSSE provides coordinators with ample resources and guidance to accomplish these tasks.

Helpful Information for Current Coordinators

Individual institutions will all receive the same consortium reports as part of their institutional report package. These will have frequencies and means comparisons (where applicable) for the individual institution, compared to the other consortium institutions.

This is a single report offered to the Consortium Coordinator (who may or may not choose to share it with the member institutions or other consortium stakeholders). There are two options available for the coordinator report. One is an aggregate style report that just has the aggregate (i.e. combined) frequencies and Engagement Indicators for all of the institutions that participated in the consortium. The other is a side-by-side style report that has aggregate frequencies for all of the participating institutions, as well as Engagement Indicators and High Impact Practices results for the individual institutions, with each institution appearing as a column next to one another (hence the name side-by-side). Because individual institutional results are part of this type of report, we need to have signed data sharing agreements from all institutions in the consortium.

Consortia Coordinators also can request a data file (SPSS and/or Excel) that includes student-level data (i.e. each student’s individual responses are represented by a row in the data file). To provide this to coordinators, we need to have signed data sharing agreements from all institutions in the consortium.

The Consortium Coordinator needs to collect these agreements ONLY IF they want the side-by-side style reports or a student-level data set. Coordinators always receive an aggregate style coordinator report.

Examples of How Consortia Have Put NSSE Data to Use

University of St. Thomas (TX), member of the 2012 Catholic Colleges & Universities consortium. The Catholic Colleges Consortium questions focus on assessing mission effectiveness. Results provide participating institutions evidence of mission fulfillment for accreditation and the extent to which institutional goals align with mission. The consortium produces a custom report titled, Mission Perception Inventory (MPI) to compare the mean performance on the overall MPI items and subscales with consortium schools. The University of Saint Mary uses its consortium results to assess the distinctiveness of their campus ministry program and to promote campus conversations about outcomes of their first-year experience course and the campus ministry program.
Since its formation in 2011, more than 40 institutions have participated in the Sustainability Education Consortium. The consortium added 20 questions to assess engagement in sustainability education across the curriculum to develop a user-friendly assessment system for sustainability education. With these results, institutions could (a) acquire a cross-institution data set on students’ engagement with aspects of sustainability, (b) assess institutional strengths and weaknesses with respect to sustainability education compared to peers, and (c) provide one source of assessment data for the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education’s (AASHE) education initiative.